Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page 1 of 212next »

Downchecking this one too. Needs a rewrite for tone and accuracy.

by DrClefDrClef, 01 Aug 2012 18:51

I'm downchecking this one. Doesn't seem right for some reason. Anyone want to take a shot at fixing it?

by DrClefDrClef, 01 Aug 2012 18:50
BlandBland 30 Jul 2012 22:17
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » LTE-2101-Freud-Warhol

The following fliers were posted around Central Park 24 hours after destruction of LTE-2101-Warhol.

Implies the GOC posted them. Advise change to explicitly use the term "found".

by BlandBland, 30 Jul 2012 22:17

I agree, and I've been doing my best to keep that in mind. (Not only that, but it's entirely possible that the GOC is aware of organizations the Foundation isn't, and vice versa; hence why the entry on the Church is somewhat more complete than the Foundation's, and the entry on the Chaos Insurgency is more sparse.)

I do think that the descriptions thus far are reasonable, though. Unless there's something specific I'm forgetting?

by NoaqiyeumNoaqiyeum, 11 Feb 2010 18:40

Noaqiyeum and I have been working on the Threat Entity Typology page. Added the page Sentient Organisms using Clef's "Type-Green" template. Still a little shaky on the style.

New Content by bleggsbleggs, 10 Feb 2010 23:50

Depends on the situation, I'd argue. If it's not a threat, watch it and wait until you figure out a way to destroy it. If it is a threat, capture, contain, monitor, and figure out a way to kill it.

Re: Announcing the GOC Wiki by DrClefDrClef, 10 Feb 2010 19:52

One request: I'd prefer it if we don't just duplicate the Other Organizations list from the SCP wiki. The Foundation and the GOC have different priorities, after all.

by DrClefDrClef, 10 Feb 2010 19:42

Policy question: what does GOC do if it can't terminate something? Capture it? Leave it for the Foundation to sweep up?

Re: Announcing the GOC Wiki by bleggsbleggs, 10 Feb 2010 04:39
NoaqiyeumNoaqiyeum 09 Feb 2010 21:09
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Response Levels

I assume these response levels apply not only to Known TEs but also to Unknown and Potential? Or do those simply have a default response level of 1 and 0 until enough information is acquired to reclassify them as Known?

by NoaqiyeumNoaqiyeum, 09 Feb 2010 21:09

I have this sort of idea of the GOC as Crazy Prepared - they don't really care about stuff they've already killed except insofar as they succeeded in killing it, but instead of their researchers figuring out how these things do work (as the Foundation does), they're busy theorizing how to kill things they haven't even encountered yet by extrapolating from things they already have. So each Termination Procedure would focus on a general type of threat entity, listing their common attributes and recurring flaws, with recommended termination methods for when these flaws are observed in new threats. Possibly including a brief list of LTEs that have already been dealt with with each method, as well as KTEs/UTEs for which each method may be applicable.

Re: Announcing the GOC Wiki by NoaqiyeumNoaqiyeum, 08 Feb 2010 21:16
Dr GearsDr Gears 13 May 2009 12:56
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » KTE 0706 Black

I like it…it's similar enough to see what it is, but different enough that it almost feels like a new item. Very good work!

by Dr GearsDr Gears, 13 May 2009 12:56
DrClefDrClef 12 May 2009 17:27
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » KTE 0706 Black

Here is an example of a classic SCP done up in the POV of the Coalition.

by DrClefDrClef, 12 May 2009 17:27
DrClefDrClef 12 May 2009 16:31
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » LTE 0913 Ex Machina

A Sample Threat Entity entry.

by DrClefDrClef, 12 May 2009 16:31
DrClefDrClef 11 May 2009 16:01
in discussion Hidden / Per page discussions » Response Levels

This one needs to be fleshed out a bit more. Thoughts?

by DrClefDrClef, 11 May 2009 16:01

This is the kind of format I'd like to see for emergency procedures: lots of tech-speak, and a bit of a feeling of dread. There should be a feeling that you really don't want to have to resort to this.

by DrClefDrClef, 11 May 2009 15:59

You don't, not yet. We're still setting up the wiki's structure.

Re: Announcing the GOC Wiki by DrClefDrClef, 11 May 2009 15:54

Hey, how do I edit stuff?

Re: Announcing the GOC Wiki by Dr GranganDr Grangan, 09 May 2009 22:30

Personally, my use for the wiki will be the following:
Whenever someone at the SCP Foundation says "Hey this isn't indestructable why don't we just kill this thing", an argument that I hate, I'll say "I think that you're looking for here", and then link here.

Re: Announcing the GOC Wiki by Dr GranganDr Grangan, 09 May 2009 22:15

What do you think would be more of a focal point for this one? I'm thinking maybe a mix of after pre and post action reports, as well as instruction manuals, and some individual case reports.

With the reports, we don't have to have that semi sort of closure we used to have with the SCP, since we could just have encounter logs, or similar things.

Also, instead of of Containment Procedures, the GOC can put emphasis on Termination Procedures instead. Guides on how to kill "supernatural" entities. Perhaps even more detailed reports on other SCP factions, seeing as how the GOC seems to have more in-depth knowledge of some of them than the Foundation, and also since they are more likely to get into violent clashes over the destruction of SCPs.

What I also picture is the GOC secretly preparing the general population for a war against TEs. All of the common myths about how to kill what we percieve as monsters, ie: silver against werewolves, sunlight against vampires, etc. are popularized by the GOC to secretly educate the general population on how to fight TEs without actually raising any alarm bells.

Perhaps we can also play on its WWII occult roots, but I'm not quite sure how to do that yet….

page 1 of 212next »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License